Virtual Server One port hearing and Multiple port Balance
Hugo Gomez
Member ✭
Hi community
I want to know if it is possible to balance between two different real servers that use ten different ports each of them.
This using only One Virtual Server hearing in only one port
This is a configuration example what I'm talking:
slb server DNS1_SERVER 100.18.1.200
health-check-disable
port 80 tcp
health-check-disable
port 5000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 6000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 7000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 8000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 9000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 1000 tcp
health-check-disable
!
slb server DNS2_SERVER 100.18.1.201
health-check-disable
port 80 tcp
health-check-disable
port 5000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 6000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 7000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 8000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 9000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 1000 tcp
health-check-disable
slb service-group SLB_DNS_1/2_SG tcp
method least-connection
member DNS1_SERVER 80
member DNS1_SERVER 5000
member DNS1_SERVER 6000
member DNS1_SERVER 7000
member DNS1_SERVER 8000
member DNS1_SERVER 9000
member DNS1_SERVER 1000
member DNS2_SERVER 80
member DNS2_SERVER 5000
member DNS2_SERVER 6000
member DNS2_SERVER 7000
member DNS2_SERVER 8000
member DNS2_SERVER 9000
member DNS2_SERVER 1000
slb virtual-server ADC-SLB_M_MITEC 172.28.85.162
extended-stats
port 443 https
extended-stats
service-group SLB_DNS_1/2_SG
use-rcv-hop-for-resp
I want to know if the above configuration can works.
Your comments will be very appreciated
Thanks,
I want to know if it is possible to balance between two different real servers that use ten different ports each of them.
This using only One Virtual Server hearing in only one port
This is a configuration example what I'm talking:
slb server DNS1_SERVER 100.18.1.200
health-check-disable
port 80 tcp
health-check-disable
port 5000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 6000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 7000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 8000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 9000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 1000 tcp
health-check-disable
!
slb server DNS2_SERVER 100.18.1.201
health-check-disable
port 80 tcp
health-check-disable
port 5000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 6000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 7000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 8000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 9000 tcp
health-check-disable
port 1000 tcp
health-check-disable
slb service-group SLB_DNS_1/2_SG tcp
method least-connection
member DNS1_SERVER 80
member DNS1_SERVER 5000
member DNS1_SERVER 6000
member DNS1_SERVER 7000
member DNS1_SERVER 8000
member DNS1_SERVER 9000
member DNS1_SERVER 1000
member DNS2_SERVER 80
member DNS2_SERVER 5000
member DNS2_SERVER 6000
member DNS2_SERVER 7000
member DNS2_SERVER 8000
member DNS2_SERVER 9000
member DNS2_SERVER 1000
slb virtual-server ADC-SLB_M_MITEC 172.28.85.162
extended-stats
port 443 https
extended-stats
service-group SLB_DNS_1/2_SG
use-rcv-hop-for-resp
I want to know if the above configuration can works.
Your comments will be very appreciated
Thanks,
Tagged:
0
Comments
Do realise that when using the method "least-connection" the ADC will still keep track of the nr of sessions per "server", if the servers tie, then it will select the server-port with the fewest connections.
If both servers have the same amount of ports (as in your case) you can also use the "service-least-connections" method to achieve an even nr of connections per server and per port. (assuming both servers will always have the same nr of ports active).