This might be a bug in 4.0 as I see an identical fail-over policy template called “tracking”. Also, Is there a reason why you would use weight within the fail over template? I suggest that you use priority cost over weight. I have set a sample config below for you to follow. Let know the result and good luck!
I configured the Policy-Based Failover Template to use both the “preempt-mode disable” and the port tracking.
There are statements in the manunal as blow;
VRRP-A provides flexible event tracking and policy-based failover support via a template. This feature allows policy-based failover even when VRRP-A preemption is disabled and the ACOS device typically would remain in an Active state, despite VRID priority changes. It allows for event-based failover once a tracked event occurs.
Do you know the another way to apply both the “preempt-mode disable” and the port tracking feature?
Thanks,
Vinnie.